added stp/stD observed behaviors
This commit is contained in:
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ The presynapse does not release blindly. Its behaviour is governed by three inte
|
||||
- NT added to cleft
|
||||
- NT_released_this_window accumulates (feeds mGluR and IP3 in seconds loop)
|
||||
- NT passively diffuses out of cleft (physical, not astrocyte)
|
||||
- Observed behaviors:
|
||||
-- STD: exhaustion of NT momentarly stops presynapse from releasing NT
|
||||
-- STP: Ca2+ left in the presynapse beteween spikes primes next NT release.
|
||||
|
||||
— seconds:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -140,6 +143,9 @@ The simplification impies that:
|
||||
- NT released into cleft — rate determined by Ca²⁺ level and NT already in cleft
|
||||
- NT released accumulates (feeds sec behavior)
|
||||
- NT passively diffuses out of cleft
|
||||
- Observed behaviors:
|
||||
-- STD: exhaustion of NT momentarly stops presynapse from releasing NT
|
||||
-- STP: Ca2+ left in the presynapse beteween spikes primes next NT release.
|
||||
|
||||
**— seconds:**
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -300,4 +300,104 @@ Structural-Update: Context
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## short term
|
||||
|
||||
Short-term potentiation (STP) and short-term depression (STD) are distinct from LTP/LTD in a fundamental way: they are **temporary** changes that last seconds to minutes and leave no lasting structural trace. They do not require the postsynapse at all — they are entirely presynaptic phenomena in most cases, and they operate on a completely different mechanism.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**What they are and where they live**
|
||||
|
||||
Short-term plasticity is driven by the **history of presynaptic Ca²⁺** and **vesicle pool state**, not by postsynaptic coincidence detection. The table we just built describes long-term plasticity — structural changes to AMPA density driven by Ca_post. Short-term plasticity describes transient changes to **how much NT the presynapse releases** on the next spike, driven by what happened on the last few spikes.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two opposing forms:
|
||||
|
||||
**Short-term potentiation / facilitation** — if a spike arrives shortly after the previous one, residual Ca²⁺ from the first spike has not fully cleared. The next spike adds to this residual, producing a larger Ca_post microdomain and therefore a higher release probability. The synapse releases more NT on the second spike than the first. This is already partially captured in the presynaptic model through `Tr_Ca` — elevated calcium trace from recent activity speeds up RRP recruitment and effectively increases release efficiency.
|
||||
|
||||
**Short-term depression** — if spikes arrive rapidly, the RRP depletes faster than it can be refilled. Each successive spike releases fewer vesicles because there are fewer available. NT release drops with each spike in a burst. This is already the core of CASCADE 1 in the presynaptic model — RRP depletion under high firing rate.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Where they fit in the model**
|
||||
|
||||
Both are already implicitly present in the presynaptic ms and seconds loops:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Short-term facilitation:
|
||||
Residual Ca_micro from spike N
|
||||
→ elevated Ca_micro at spike N+1
|
||||
→ higher release fraction in deterministic_release (Hill curve)
|
||||
→ more NT per spike
|
||||
→ decays as Ca_micro clears between spikes (tau ~100-200 ms)
|
||||
|
||||
Short-term depression:
|
||||
Rapid firing depletes N_RRP
|
||||
→ fewer vesicles available per spike
|
||||
→ released_NT falls
|
||||
→ recovers as RP→RRP recruitment refills (seconds timescale)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The timescale of each depends on parameters already in the model:
|
||||
|
||||
| Form | Timescale | Driven by | Recovery |
|
||||
|--------------|------------|-------------------|-------------------------|
|
||||
| Facilitation | 100-500 ms | residual Ca_micro | Ca²⁺ clearance rate |
|
||||
| Depression | seconds | RRP depletion | RP→RRP recruitment rate |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**What is missing from the current model**
|
||||
|
||||
The model captures both implicitly but does not name them as behaviours. Two things are genuinely absent:
|
||||
|
||||
**Augmentation** — a slower form of facilitation lasting 5-10 seconds, driven by residual Ca²⁺ accumulating in the presynaptic terminal across many spikes. It is distinct from spike-by-spike facilitation and would require a second, slower Ca²⁺ trace with `tau ~5000 ms`. The current `Tr_Ca` with `tau = 1000 ms` is between the two — it captures some augmentation but not cleanly.
|
||||
|
||||
**Post-tetanic potentiation (PTP)** — an even slower presynaptic enhancement lasting minutes after a high-frequency burst, driven by protein kinase C activation from sustained Ca²⁺ elevation. This is a presynaptic phenomenon that looks like LTP from the outside but has no postsynaptic component and no structural change. It would require a third, very slow trace variable.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**How they interact with the LTP/LTD table**
|
||||
|
||||
Short-term and long-term plasticity operate on the same synapse simultaneously but independently:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Spike arrives
|
||||
→ short-term: how much NT releases THIS spike (presynaptic, ms-seconds)
|
||||
→ long-term: does the synapse get stronger or weaker PERMANENTLY (postsynaptic, mins-hours)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A synapse can be undergoing LTD (slowly losing AMPA receptors over minutes) at the same time as it is showing short-term facilitation (releasing more NT per spike due to residual Ca²⁺). The two processes do not interfere — they act on different variables through different mechanisms.
|
||||
|
||||
The important implication for your model is that **the LTP/LTD table we built describes what happens to** `g_AMPA_baseline` **over minutes**. Short-term potentiation/depression describes what happens to `released_NT` over milliseconds to seconds. They are different outputs of the same synapse, running in parallel.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to add short-term plasticity explicitly to the behaviour specification it would live entirely in the presynaptic ms and seconds loops as named episodes of existing variables:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
— ms (presynapse, short-term plasticity):
|
||||
|
||||
ShortTermFacilitation: Episode
|
||||
— residual Ca_micro > 0 at next spike arrival
|
||||
— release_frac in deterministic_release elevated above baseline
|
||||
— decays as Ca_micro clears (tau ~100-500 ms)
|
||||
— more NT per spike than at rest
|
||||
|
||||
ShortTermDepression: Episode
|
||||
— N_RRP depleted by rapid successive spikes
|
||||
— release_frac unchanged but N_RRP reduced
|
||||
— fewer absolute vesicles released per spike
|
||||
— recovers via RP→RRP recruitment (seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
— seconds (presynapse, short-term plasticity):
|
||||
|
||||
Augmentation: Episode [GAP — not yet modelled]
|
||||
— requires second slow Ca2+ trace (tau ~5000 ms)
|
||||
— elevated release probability for 5-10 s after burst
|
||||
— distinct from spike-by-spike facilitation
|
||||
|
||||
PostTetanicPotentiation: Episode [GAP — not yet modelled]
|
||||
— requires very slow trace (tau ~minutes)
|
||||
— elevated release probability for minutes after tetanus
|
||||
— presynaptic only, no postsynaptic component
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user