varie
This commit is contained in:
+2
-2
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ The axon does not contain specific behavior. We might add balancing of ATP withi
|
||||
container: AXON
|
||||
|
||||
expansion: PRESYNAPSE ( full: 50x, active: 0x, empty: 10x )
|
||||
# managed_by: BEH-EXH or BEH-INH from winnertakeall
|
||||
# developed_by: DEV-AXO-PRESYNAPSE-TUB from DEV-N
|
||||
# managed_by: EXCITATION or INHIBITION from winnertakeall
|
||||
# developed_by: AXO-PRE-TUB-DEV from NIGHT-N
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## PRESYNAPSE: Container
|
||||
|
||||
+19
-93
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# night-neuron: Modulator
|
||||
# night-neuron: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
Neuron Development - LTP-LTD Behavior:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,100 +31,26 @@ Downregulation:
|
||||
> Night Time Scale
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-N
|
||||
developer: NIGHT-N
|
||||
contained_by: N
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-RF: Modulator
|
||||
|
||||
Perche’ mettiamo RF in DEV e non in TUN?
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-RF
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-N
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-VesciclesRecycling-RF: Modulator
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-PRE-VesciclesRecycling-RF
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-RF
|
||||
|
||||
modulates: BEH-PRE/episode/VesciclesRecycling
|
||||
# each BEH-PRE is modulated!
|
||||
|
||||
tub_dev:
|
||||
- fulMod ( fullness: None, active: rf/fullness, emptiness: 0x )
|
||||
- actMod ( fullness: None, active: rf/active, emptiness: 0x )
|
||||
|
||||
# qui stiamo modulando l'active di RF mantenendolo fra fullness e
|
||||
# emptiness dichiarato in VesciclesRecycling
|
||||
|
||||
tub_local:
|
||||
|
||||
tub_intricated:
|
||||
- Nox ( contained_by: BEH-POST )
|
||||
- Ecb ( contained_by: BEH-POST )
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Context
|
||||
|
||||
#### Episode
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-VesiclesFillingRP-RF: Modulator
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-PRE-VesiclesFillingRP-RF
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-RF
|
||||
|
||||
modulates:
|
||||
|
||||
tub_local:
|
||||
|
||||
tub_intricated:
|
||||
- Nox ( contained_by: BEH-POST )
|
||||
- Ecb ( contained_by: BEH-POST )
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Context
|
||||
|
||||
#### Episode
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-LactateAtp-RF: Modulator
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-PRE-LactateAtp-RF
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-RF
|
||||
|
||||
modulates:
|
||||
|
||||
tub_local:
|
||||
|
||||
tub_intricated:
|
||||
- Nox ( contained_by: BEH-POST )
|
||||
- Ecb ( contained_by: BEH-POST )
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Context
|
||||
|
||||
#### Episode
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-TUB-FLOOR: Modulator
|
||||
## DEV-TUB-FLOOR: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
Perche’ mettiamo Full in DEV e non in TUN?
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-TUB-FLOOR
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-N
|
||||
developer: DEV-TUB-FLOOR
|
||||
contained_by: NIGHT-N
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-CA2+-TUB: Modulator
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-CA2+-TUB: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-PRE-CA2+-TUB
|
||||
developer: DEV-PRE-CA2+-TUB
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-TUB-FLOOR
|
||||
|
||||
modulates: BEH-PRE/tub/Ca2+ # this is the tub whose "full" must be modulated
|
||||
develops: BEH-PRE/tub/Ca2+ # this is the tub whose "full" must be modulated
|
||||
|
||||
tub_dev:
|
||||
- fullMod ( fullness: 100x, active: Ca2+/fullness, emptiness: 50x ) # Ca2+Full "contains" a number of blocks equal to the current Full.
|
||||
@@ -174,13 +100,13 @@ episode: VgccOpen
|
||||
trace: None
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-RRP-TUB: Modulator
|
||||
### DEV-PRE-RRP-TUB: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-PRE-RRP-TUB
|
||||
developer: DEV-PRE-RRP-TUB
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-TUB-FLOOR
|
||||
|
||||
modulates: BEH-PRE/tub/Rrp # this is the tub whose "full" must be modulated
|
||||
develops: BEH-PRE/tub/Rrp # this is the tub whose "full" must be modulated
|
||||
|
||||
tub_dev:
|
||||
- fullMod ( fullness: 100x, active: Rrp/fullness, emptiness: 50x ) # RrpFull "contains" a number of blocks equal to the current Full.
|
||||
@@ -199,7 +125,7 @@ modulator: DEV-PRE-RRP-TUB
|
||||
|
||||
#### Episode
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-TUB-CONCEPTUAL: Modulator
|
||||
## DEV-TUB-CONCEPTUAL: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
Qui la PRE e la POST si predispongono per dare le condizioni a SYN di stabilire o eliminare una sinapsi. Per ora questo comportamento lo mettiamo in TUN perche’ non si tratta di creare o distruggere PRE o POST, ma di rendere disponibile a SYN la possibilita’ di creare o distruggere una SYN. Durante il Day c’e’ il TUN che mette a disposizione, durante il Night SYN crea o distrugge gli accoppiamenti PRE POST.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -208,19 +134,19 @@ ATTENZIONE: Questo e POST e’ da cambiare, perche’ c’e’ il passaggio da T
|
||||
> Minutes/hours Time Scale
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-TUB-CONCEPTUAL
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-N
|
||||
developer: DEV-TUB-CONCEPTUAL
|
||||
contained_by: NIGHT-N
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-AXO-BEH-PRE-TUB: Modulator
|
||||
### AXO-PRE-TUB-DEV: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
Qui stiamo ragionanando sulla trasformazione fra bottone presinaptico inattivo e bottone attivo, pronto a diventare parte di una sinapsi. Il ragionamento e' locale, e mette a disposizione o toglie un bottone attivo che un altro ragionamento, in TUN-WTA, fara' su questo bottone, il bottone postisinaptico e una sinapsi disponibile. Agiamo sulla fullness di BEH-PRE.
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-AXO-BEH-PRE-TUB
|
||||
developer: AXO-PRE-TUB-DEV
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-TUB-CONCEPTUAL
|
||||
|
||||
modulates: N/AXO/BEH-AXO/expansion/BEH-PRE
|
||||
develops: N/AXO/BEH-AXO/expansion/BEH-PRE
|
||||
# qui stiamo modulando fullness del tub BEH-PRE associandoli a tub_modulation prePos e PreAct.
|
||||
|
||||
tub_modulation:
|
||||
@@ -262,10 +188,10 @@ episode: TunSynAxoPre
|
||||
trace: None
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### DEV-BD-BEH-POST-TUB: Modulator
|
||||
### DEV-BD-BEH-POST-TUB: Developer
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
modulator: DEV-BD-BEH-POST-TUB
|
||||
developer: DEV-BD-BEH-POST-TUB
|
||||
|
||||
contained_by: DEV-TUB-CONCEPTUAL
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# excitation.md
|
||||
|
||||
## BEH-EXH: Container
|
||||
## EXCITATION: Container
|
||||
|
||||
**Exhitatory Behavior**: L'associazione PRE<->POST<->SYN concettuale, che verra' trasformata in attuale dall'interprete/enliver. Questo container viene invocato da una riga di espansione in BEH-WTA, quindi ha a disposizione BEH-AXO, BEH-BD e BEH-AST di riferimento. E quindi in enliving abbiamo a disposizione le BEH-PRE, BEH-POST e BEH-SYN attuali.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ BEH-AST mette a disposizione BEH-SYN, BEH-AXO BEH-PRE e BEH-BD BEH-POST. Fare un
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
|
||||
container: BEH-EXH
|
||||
container: EXCITATION
|
||||
|
||||
tub_local: ??? (fullness: 50x, active: 0x, emptiness: 0x)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Qui devo capire queste tracce chi le lascia e se sono esclusive?
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
context: CheckSynModification
|
||||
|
||||
contained_by: BEH-EXH
|
||||
contained_by: EXCITATION
|
||||
in_context: Fixed
|
||||
rf: 60x
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Qui attiviamo la Syn collegando Pre e Post
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
episode: activate
|
||||
contained_by: BEH-EXH
|
||||
contained_by: EXCITATION
|
||||
|
||||
in_context: ActivateSyn
|
||||
rf: ( active: 6x )
|
||||
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Qui deattiviamo la Syn
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
episode: DeActivate
|
||||
contained_by: BEH-EXH
|
||||
contained_by: EXCITATION
|
||||
|
||||
in_context: DeActivateSyn
|
||||
rf: ( active: 6x )
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# inhibition.md
|
||||
|
||||
## BEH-INH: Container
|
||||
## INHIBITION: Container
|
||||
|
||||
**Inhibitory Behavior**:
|
||||
|
||||
```Gen
|
||||
|
||||
container: BEH-INH
|
||||
container: INHIBITION
|
||||
|
||||
tub_local: ??? (fullness: 50x, active: 0x, emptiness: 0x)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user