From 2d6938e145bd12a38db48755da2263e04e9a77b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ocrampal Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 11:49:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update 2026-06-06-tripartite_synapse_v2.md --- elements/astrocyte/appunti/2026-06-06-tripartite_synapse_v2.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/elements/astrocyte/appunti/2026-06-06-tripartite_synapse_v2.md b/elements/astrocyte/appunti/2026-06-06-tripartite_synapse_v2.md index c65721b..6287a65 100644 --- a/elements/astrocyte/appunti/2026-06-06-tripartite_synapse_v2.md +++ b/elements/astrocyte/appunti/2026-06-06-tripartite_synapse_v2.md @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ Acetylcholine has two main sources: the basal forebrain nuclei (including the nu What's striking in the context of your model is that all three systems share the same architectural logic: a tiny, localized cell population broadcasts a global contextual signal that shifts the operational threshold of millions of synapses simultaneously — none of them carrying specific content, all of them modulating how content gets written. -## Simple organisms +### Simple organisms Excellent point. The hippocampal replay model is a vertebrate solution to a specific problem — how to consolidate many parallel experiences quickly without catastrophic interference. But the underlying molecular logic of the commit function is far more ancient and appears in organisms that have no hippocampus, no sleep architecture in the vertebrate sense, and sometimes no centralized nervous system at all.