ocrampal/organism
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

varie

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ocrampal
2026-05-02 20:56:06 +02:00
parent 51098e995a
commit 13dfd72e78
2 changed files with 89 additions and 80 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
winnertakeall/excitation.md
+46 -43
View File
@@ -10,73 +10,76 @@ BEH-AST mette a disposizione SYNAPSE, AXON PRESYNAPSE e BEH-BD POSTSYNAPSE. Fare
```Gen
container: EXCITATION
EXCITATION
tub_local: ??? (fullness: 50x, active: 0x, emptiness: 0x)
type: container
tub_intricated:
- PRESYNAPSE from neuron/presynapse.md
- POSTSYNAPSE from neuron/postsynapse.md
- SYNAPSE from astrocyte/synapse.md
tub_local: ??? (fullness: 50x, active: 0x, emptiness: 0x)
- GoodTraces ( contained_by: -?? )
- BadTraces ( contained_by: -?? )
tub_intricated:
- PRESYNAPSE from neuron/presynapse.md
- POSTSYNAPSE from neuron/postsynapse.md
- SYNAPSE from astrocyte/synapse.md
- GoodTraces ( contained_by: -?? )
- BadTraces ( contained_by: -?? )
context_intricated:
- TunPossible ( contained_by: winnertakeall.md )
- TunPossible ( contained_by: winnertakeall.md )
```
### CheckSynModification: Context
### CheckSynModification: contextor
Qui devo capire queste tracce chi le lascia e se sono esclusive?
```Gen
context: CheckSynModification
CheckSynModification: ( active: 60x )
contained_by: EXCITATION
in_context: Fixed
rf: 60x
condition: ( GoodTraces Full ) AND NOT ( SYNAPSE full ) AND NOT ( PRESYNAPSE full ) AND NOT ( POSTSYNAPSE full)
out_context: ActivateSyn
condition: ( BadTraces Full )
out_context: DeActivateSyn
```
### Activate: Episode
Qui attiviamo la Syn collegando Pre e Post
```Gen
episode: activate
type: contextor
contained_by: EXCITATION
in_context: ActivateSyn
rf: ( active: 6x )
in_context: Fixed
condition: ( GoodTraces fullness ) AND NOT ( SYNAPSE full ) AND NOT ( PRESYNAPSE full ) AND NOT ( POSTSYNAPSE full)
out_context: ActivateSyn_ctx
hypothesis: ( GoodTraces full ) AND NOT ( ??? full )
action:
bind_containers: # Novita'
[PRESYNAPSE increase, POSTSYNAPSE increase, SYNAPSE increase, GoodTraces decrease]
trace: None
condition: ( BadTraces fullness )
out_context: DeActivateSyn_ctx
```
### DeActivate: Episode
### Activate: binder
Qui attiviamo la Syn collegando Pre e Post. Lo facciamo per tutte le relazioni fino a quando GoodTraces fullness
```Gen
activateSyn: ( active: 6x )
type: binder
contained_by: EXCITATION
in_context: ActivateSyn_ctx
hypothesis: ( GoodTraces fullness )
bind_containers: # Novita'
[PRESYNAPSE increase, POSTSYNAPSE increase, SYNAPSE increase, GoodTraces decrease]
trace: None
```
### DeActivate: binder
Qui deattiviamo la Syn
```Gen
episode: DeActivate
DeActivate: ( active: 6x )
type: binder
contained_by: EXCITATION
in_context: DeActivateSyn
rf: ( active: 6x )
hypothesis: (BadTraces full)
action:
in_context: DeActivateSyn_ctx
hypothesis: (BadTraces fullness)
bind_containers: # Devo essere sicuro di eliminare i 3 che sono collegati, non a caso.
[PRESYNAPSE decrease, POSTSYNAPSE decrease, SYNAPSE decrease, GoodTraces decrease]
trace: None
```
### ClearTraces: accumulator
deco capire dove eliminare le tracce bad e good.
winnertakeall/winnertakeall.md
+43 -37
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# winnertakeal: Comprehension
# winnertakeall: Comprehension
Qui comprendiamo il circuito WTA. Il behavior del WTA avviene di NIGHT dopo che DEV-SYN, DEV-POST e DEV-PRE hanno lavorato. E' un po' una novita' perche' avevo pensato che solo DEV avvenisse di NIGHT, ma ha senso, si tratta di un comportamento a livello di circuiti, e quindi riorganizzazione notturna.
@@ -10,17 +10,19 @@ L'eventuale modulazione di WTA, per ora non lo prendo in considerazione. L'ipote
Per ora non mi e' chiaro il ruolo del TUN.
```Gen
comprehension: WTA
WINNERTAKEALL
include:
excitation.md
inhibition.md
neuron.md
astrocyte.md
???.md ( BEH-INC )
???.md ( BEH-OUT )
type: comprehension
expansion: WTA ( active: 1x )
include:
excitation.md
inhibition.md
neuron.md
astrocyte.md
???.md ( BEH-INC )
???.md ( BEH-OUT )
expansion: WTA ( active: 1x )
```
@@ -40,39 +42,43 @@ A differenza di BD che espande PRE implicitamente e trattando PRE tutti allo ste
- posso pensare di produrre il circuito in ambiente visuale tipo DrawIO, e avere un parser che me lo trasforma in questa sintassi.
```Gen
container: WTA
WTA-STRUCTURE
elements:
# Internal
NEU-001: NEURON
NEU-002: NEURON
NEU-003: NEURON
NEU-004: NEURON
AST-001: ASTRO
AST-002: ASTRO
type: container
# Incoming
INC-001: BEH-INC
INC-002: BEH-INC
expansion:
# Outgoing
OUT-001: BEH-OUT
OUT-002: BEH-OUT
elements:
# Internal
NEU-001: NEURON
NEU-002: NEURON
NEU-003: NEURON
NEU-004: NEURON
AST-001: ASTRO
AST-002: ASTRO
relations:
# stiamo espandendo: BEH-EXH e BEH-INH. Ciascuna riga e' un'espansione specifica e actual. La lista "-" serve perche' il primo termine di espansione viene ripetuto.
# Incoming
INC-001: BEH-INC
INC-002: BEH-INC
# AREA-001
- EXCITATION: NEU-001.BEH-AXO -> NEU-003.BEH-BD(1) ~AST-001
- INHIBITION: NEU-002.BEH-AXO -> NEU-003.BEH-SOMA ~AST-002
# Outgoing
OUT-001: BEH-OUT
OUT-002: BEH-OUT
# AREA-002
- EXCITATION: NEU-003.BEH-AXO -> NEU-004.BEH-BD(3) ~AST-001
- EXCITATION: NEU-004.BEH-AXO -> NEU-002.BEH-BD(1) ~AST-002
relations:
# stiamo espandendo: BEH-EXH e BEH-INH. Ciascuna riga e' un'espansione specifica e actual. La lista "-" serve perche' il primo termine di espansione viene ripetuto.
# INCOMING-001
- EXCITATION: INC-001.BEH-AXO -> NEU-001.BEH-BD(1) ~@
# AREA-001
- EXCITATION: NEU-001.BEH-AXO -> NEU-003.BEH-BD(1) ~AST-001
- INHIBITION: NEU-002.BEH-AXO -> NEU-003.BEH-SOMA ~AST-002
# OUTGOING-001
- INHIBITION: NEU-003.BEH-AXO -> OUT-001.BEH-SOMA ~@
# AREA-002
- EXCITATION: NEU-003.BEH-AXO -> NEU-004.BEH-BD(3) ~AST-001
- EXCITATION: NEU-004.BEH-AXO -> NEU-002.BEH-BD(1) ~AST-002
# INCOMING-001
- EXCITATION: INC-001.BEH-AXO -> NEU-001.BEH-BD(1) ~@
# OUTGOING-001
- INHIBITION: NEU-003.BEH-AXO -> OUT-001.BEH-SOMA ~@
```