no ecb messages
This commit is contained in:
@@ -274,3 +274,60 @@ The distinction matters biologically: a private reserve guarantees a component s
|
||||
(the bouton can refill its RRP from its own vesicles even when lactate is scarce), while a
|
||||
contested supply couples a component's fate to its neighbours' demands (operational budget
|
||||
fails first where many active synapses compete for the same lactate).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## PRE ↔ POST interaction: local computation, message-only coupling
|
||||
|
||||
The presynapse and postsynapse never read each other's internal state. They interact only
|
||||
by writing to and reading from shared cleft channels. Each side computes entirely locally on
|
||||
what it has: its own variables plus whatever signals have arrived in the cleft. This is the
|
||||
message-passing realization of the locality principle.
|
||||
|
||||
**Forward channel — glutamate (PRE → POST and ASTRO).** The presynapse writes glutamate via
|
||||
NT_flux. The postsynapse reads it (AMPA, NMDA) and the astrosynapse reads it (clearance,
|
||||
mGluR5). The astrosynapse clears it. PRE never knows whether POST responded — it only emits.
|
||||
|
||||
**Gate channel — astro_Dserine (ASTRO → POST).** The astrosynapse writes D-serine; the
|
||||
postsynapse reads it as the obligatory NMDA co-agonist. POST cannot open NMDA without this
|
||||
arrived signal, but it does not read the astrocyte's state — only the delivered D-serine.
|
||||
|
||||
**Backward channel + — retro_NO (POST → PRE).** When the postsynapse's NMDA opens (Mg²⁺
|
||||
ejected, D-serine present, glutamate bound), nNOS — physically tethered to the NMDA receptor
|
||||
through PSD-95 — synthesises nitric oxide (and, on a slower timescale, BDNF is released).
|
||||
These diffuse retrogradely to the presynapse. Biologically this is the classic retrograde
|
||||
messenger of LTP: it tells the bouton that its release landed on a postsynapse that genuinely
|
||||
responded. In the model, POST emits `retro_NO` proportional to its own NMDA-driven calcium —
|
||||
computed purely from POST's local state — and PRE reads it as `retro_NO_local`.
|
||||
|
||||
`retro_NO_local` is exactly the grounding of the presynaptic endurance signal. The
|
||||
presynapse's local success proxy is "I was releasing strongly" (`pre_fast_trace` high). On
|
||||
its own that only says the bouton was working hard, not that the work mattered. `retro_NO`
|
||||
adds the missing confirmation — that the postsynapse responded — without PRE ever reading
|
||||
POST's calcium. So PRE deposits endurance need as `pre_fast_trace × (1 + retro_NO_local)`:
|
||||
strong release that was confirmed effective makes the strongest claim that fuel, not
|
||||
futility, was what interrupted a forming success. retro_NO is short-lived (NO degrades and
|
||||
diffuses within seconds), so the channel decays fast — confirmation must be recent to count.
|
||||
|
||||
**Backward channel − — retro_eCB (POST → PRE).** When the postsynapse is strongly
|
||||
depolarised, it synthesises endocannabinoids (2-AG, anandamide) that diffuse retrogradely and
|
||||
bind presynaptic CB1 receptors, suppressing release. This is depolarisation-induced
|
||||
suppression of excitation (DSE) — a homeostatic negative feedback: an over-driven postsynapse
|
||||
tells the presynapse to release less. In the model, POST emits `retro_eCB` from its own
|
||||
membrane potential, and PRE reads it as `retro_eCB_local`, which reduces the release drive
|
||||
`sat(...) × (1 - retro_eCB_local)`. Again POST computes from its own state; PRE adjusts from
|
||||
the arrived signal; neither reads the other's interior.
|
||||
|
||||
The two backward channels are opposite-signed messages the postsynapse sends about its own
|
||||
condition: retro_NO says "your input was effective — worth sustaining," retro_eCB says "I am
|
||||
saturated — ease off." Together with the forward glutamate and the D-serine gate, they make
|
||||
the synapse a fully message-coupled system of locally-computing components.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why RRP refill is in NOT_AP only.** During an AP the bouton releases — RRP depletes. Refill
|
||||
(VATPase reloading vesicles from the reserve pool) is a recovery process that proceeds between
|
||||
spikes. Placing `fill(RRP, ...)` only in the NOT_AP context makes the AP context pure
|
||||
depletion and the NOT_AP context pure recovery. A consequence falls out for free: during
|
||||
sustained high-frequency firing there are many AP steps and few NOT_AP steps, so RRP depletes
|
||||
faster than it recovers — short-term depression deepens with frequency, with no explicit
|
||||
depression rule. The release itself is throttled further when budget is low (VATPase refill
|
||||
is energy-limited), coupling metabolic state to the depth of depression.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user